Four decisions, on files that ship with the product
These four screens are what the product answers with. The measurements come from a real run on our own test files — nothing here is invented, and nothing here takes a file from you.
A demo is not a proof of your own file. Your artwork can only be answered by measuring your artwork.
No defined problem at the requested size. The delivered file is your original, unchanged — so no credit is spent. Background removal was not attempted, and the reason is stated.
No defined problem foundat 9.0 in target
2362 × 2362
Original
Measurements
Pixel size
2362 × 2362
Real detail at target
262 DPI
Safe width
11.8 in
Transparency
none
Text
found
No defined problem at this size
At the 9.0 in width you chose, and under the current DTF policy version, no defined problem was detected.
What I measured
Real detail resolution: 262 DPI
This file prints up to 11.8 in without inventing detail
Text was found, and it is intact because the file was not touched
What I could not prove
The background was not removed automatically — the mask was not safe, so the file was left as it is
A screen preview is not a physical proof
Operations not attempted
background_removal — The background mask is not safe: the background is dark (luminance 154 < 200) and may be part of the design, and it is not flat enough (std 8.9). Automatic removal was skipped.
This is your own file, unchanged. Nothing needed repairing at this size, so nothing was produced and no credit was spent.
A screen preview is not a physical proof.
Real detail is below the target for the size asked for. The file is printable, just smaller than requested — the safe width is measured, not guessed.
Can be printed smallerat 12.0 in target
3060 × 2295
Original
Measurements
Pixel size
3060 × 2295
Real detail at target
171 DPI
Safe width
10.2 in
Transparency
none
Text
found
Could not verify this at 12.0 in
The file's real detail is not enough for this width. It prints up to 10.2 in without inventing detail.
What I measured
Real detail resolution: 171 DPI (at target)
Safe width: 10.2 in
Text was found; the file was not touched
What I could not prove
That the print comes out acceptable at 12.0 in
That upscaling adds real detail — pixels increase, detail does not
A screen preview is not a physical proof. No downloadable file was produced for this job.
The safe width could not be measured. The screen says "not measured" rather than "none": an unmeasured value is not a zero.
Could not be sureat 11.0 in target
1920 × 1080
Original
Measurements
Pixel size
1920 × 1080
Real detail at target
not measured
Safe width
ölçülemedi
Transparency
none
Text
found
Could not work out what is meant to be printed
The file looks like a screen capture. The boundary of the artwork is unclear, so a safe width could not be calculated.
What I measured
Pixel size: 1920 × 1080
Text was found
Screen-capture signals were detected
What I could not prove
Which region is the artwork — which is why the safe width was NOT MEASURED
That an automatic crop would pick the right region
A screen preview is not a physical proof. No downloadable file was produced for this job.
The safe width is far below the smallest size the engine will accept. There is no way out with this file, so the screen says what to ask the customer for instead of leaving you with nothing.
Not with this fileat 10.0 in target
244 × 68
Original
976 × 272
Attempted fix
Measurements
Pixel size
244 × 68
Real detail at target
20 DPI
Safe width
1.0 in
Transparency
present
Text
not found
Not at 10.0 in with this file
Real detail is 20 DPI. Upscaling was attempted, but the width that prints without inventing detail is 1.0 in — smaller than the smallest print worth offering (4.0 in).
What I measured
Pixel size: 244 × 68
Real detail resolution: 20 DPI
Safe width: 1.0 in
What I could not prove
That the upscaled version is acceptable — upscaling adds pixels, not detail
That a usable output at this size can be produced from this file
A screen preview is not a physical proof. No downloadable file was produced for this job.
